CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5] — Page 216

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

In 636713

Copy

Houghong.

Interpretation of Terms Ordinance, No. 1 of 1867

Opinion of the Honourable J. Pattle, Attorney General

Probably Mr. Ball when he argued to wait for his return a favourable opportunity (as per Dispatch) meant that some other additions might be thought of, which might be inserted at the same time.

I agree with him that there was no immediate necessity for the passing of the proposed amendment Act, for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete practice as existed was extended by Ordinance No. 5 of 1826, the Rules of Hilary Term 1833 to the Supreme Court. By Section 1974 of...

Here is the revised output in HTML format, following the instructions:

In 636713

Copy

Hongkong.

Interpretation of Terms Ordinance, No. 1 of 1867

Opinion of the Honourable J. Pattle, Attorney General

Probably Mr. Ball when he argued to wait for his return a favourable opportunity (as per Dispatch) meant that some other additions might be thought of, which might be inserted at the same time.

Edit History

2026-05-20 03:54:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

In 636713 Copy Houghong. Interpretation of Terms Ordinance, No. 1 of 1867 Opinion of the Honourable J. Pattle, Attorney General Probably Mr. Ball when he argued to wait for his return a favourable opportunity (as per Dispatch) meant that some other additions might be thought of, which might be inserted at the same time. I agree with him that there was no immediate necessity for the passing of the proposed amendment Act, for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete practice as existed was extended by Ordinance No. 5 of 1826, the Rules of Hilary Term 1833 to the Supreme Court. By Section 1974 of... Here is the revised output in HTML format, following the instructions: In 636713 Copy Hongkong. Interpretation of Terms Ordinance, No. 1 of 1867 Opinion of the Honourable J. Pattle, Attorney General Probably Mr. Ball when he argued to wait for his return a favourable opportunity (as per Dispatch) meant that some other additions might be thought of, which might be inserted at the same time. I agree with him that there was no immediate necessity for the passing of the proposed amendment Act, for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete practice as existed was extended by Ordinance No. 5 of 1826, the Rules of Hilary Term 1833 to the Supreme Court. By Section 1974 of...

Baseline (Original)

In 636713 Copy Houghong. Inticfucctation of Terms Ordnance, M: 1 of 1867 Opinion of the barble J. Pannefate, Attorney Genval Probably M: Ball when he anggurled to wait for his Merne a) ارم نسیم # avvenent opportunity (dw Aur Dispatelo) meant that sonced other additions might be thought of, which might. be iwerted at the Dame. Anime. I agree with him that there Avas 120 immediate necessity for the passing of the proposed as exist are amendment act for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete price we extended by Ordinance M.5 of 1826 the Reds of Hilary Perm 1883 to the Wrighting Court. By Section 1974 of

2026-05-20 03:54:51 · Baseline

View content

In 636713

Copy

Houghong.

Inticfucctation of Terms Ordnance, M: 1 of 1867

Opinion of the barble J. Pannefate, Attorney Genval

Probably M: Ball when he anggurled

to wait for

his Merne

ارم نسیم

avvenent opportunity (dw

Aur Dispatelo) meant that sonced

other additions might be thought of, which

might.

iwerted at the

Dame.

Anime. I

agree

with him that there

Avas 120

immediate

necessity for the passing of the proposed

as exist are

amendment act for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete price we extended by Ordinance M.5 of 1826 the Reds of Hilary Perm 1883 to the Wrighting Court. By Section 1974 of

CO129-137 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [4-5] — Page 216

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note